Delivery System 1/5
By Eng. Ahmed Said updated September 2022
1: Design-Bid-Build delivery system (DBB).
Also known as the general
contracting project delivery method, in this system, one phase is finished
before starting the next. The most traditional systems used in the world, where the
project is designed entirely before the start of work and then the use of a
general contractor bears the responsibility of building the project in full
using a contract with the specific owner and passes through three stages:
1. Design stage.
It uses the services of a
designer who designs the project within the requirements of the owner and within
the estimated budget in advance.
2. Bidding or Tender stage.
Where construction services
are purchased from a contractor based on the design.
3. Build or construction stage.
During this, the project is constructed and built within the scope of the specific work and design documents and contract.
Figure 1
Design-Bid-Build Delivery System
Cost Estimation
These previous phases may
go through a series of cost estimates that accompany the development of
design processes that contribute significantly to the project cost management
scenario and the price of the contracted contractor when the design is
completed within the owner's budget.
The absence of
construction input into the project design may limit the effectiveness and
constructability of the design.[9]
These preliminary
estimates of the project and prior to contracting with the contractor are
used by the designer as a basis for estimating design and licensing fees.
This sequence inevitably
leads to sealed bids and fixed business prices.
Figure 2 DBB Relationships
Figure 3 DBB with PM/CM
Multiple-Prime Contracting
The employer can be entrusted
to several contractors based on his experience after the division of the
project works into integrated work packages and then management of the project
in order to ensure continuous coordination between the contractors.
The designer is also
responsible for limited supervision of the work and answers the contractor's
questions regarding the design. The owner may use a construction management
consultant to monitor implementation quality and measure progress.
Scope of application and use
This method is suitable for
projects with a limited budget and is sensitive to cost increases and is not
sensitive to the schedule where the owner controls the design and modifications
during implementation within budget limits constrained by an agreed increase.
Next is the strength, weakness, and applications of the Design-Bid-Build system:
Figure 4 Strengths, Weaknesses, and Applications of
Design-Bid-Build (DBB) System.
Advantages
·
A familiar method, especially
in government contracts.
·
The system does not need
effort or experience in managing the processes and stages of design and
delivery where it is done by parties other than the owner.
·
The designer and the
contractor are responsible for the operations before the owner.
·
The scope of work is more
specific to both construction and design.
·
Competitiveness among
contractors is the ruling and the lowest price is accepted.
·
Provide opportunities for
general contractors to acquire and develop
Disadvantages
·
Multiple stages and their
separation mean a longer period and a timetable for implementation is
unrealistic for non-interference of parties in the design.
·
The final price cannot be
determined before receiving contractors' bids.
·
Redesign may be required if the bid price exceeds the owner's budget.
·
Choosing the lowest price
does not guarantee the quality of contractors and subcontractors.
·
Cost estimates change
during design and implementation because the design inputs are not clear to the
contractor.
·
Lack of building inputs in the
design of the project may limit the effectiveness and ease of design.
·
Increase orders for change
and claims.
·
Multiprotocol interference
in implementation affects cost and design.
·
The probability of conflict
is higher due to the extension of project time, cost, and frequent interference
from project parties.
·
Cannot be relied upon for
projects that are sensitive to time and cost.
For vertical projects such as
buildings and services projects, the contract system is a sealed price for work
items or a lump sum item price.
Roads, bridges, and other
horizontal projects are usually the price of the unit and the performance is
measured therefore the owner pays the money for the quantities executed.
This is done through direct
bidding or by inviting specialized contractors and conducting competition
between them. The owner may use the pre-qualification method for contractors by
applying a set of criteria to determine the efficiency of the contractors and
their abilities and thus allow the competitors to compete and then choose the
lowest price.
This guarantees the owner and the
contractor's ability to execute the project.
In public and government
competitions, laws impose a package of financial and procedural restrictions
that make it more complex and affect the choice of the best. In the private
sector, the employer can choose the best among the competitors and then
negotiate the price to get the best value for money.
Therefore, as a natural
result of the absence of building inputs during design, and vice versa, the
absence of design input during competition makes the cost estimate more
sensitive and the reserve coefficient higher therefore the added value for
the contingency is higher.
The cost estimator is subject
to several pressures that affect the cost calculation, which takes into
consideration the nature of competition and the absence of design inputs.